agraratlas call failures of eu policy

the eu distributed their funds for agriculture, criticize the federal environmental and nature protection in germany (bund) and the heinrich boll foundation. worse still, the taxation, hour and ineffective "system is also in the next period from 2021 to 2027 continue. where the problems lie and what one could make better, boll foundation and bond in a agraratlas written down on wednesday in berlin.

the agricultural budget accounts for about a third of all eu expenditure and currently comprises more than 60 billion a year. has germany 4.8 billion a year, it said in the presentation of the report.

the main criticism of federal chief hubert weiger and christine chemnitz, agrarreferentin in boll foundation: two thirds of all funds are no significant requirements per hectare of court award. large farms: 20 percent of all credit so businesses can get 80 percent of the funds, "said chemnitz.

although get smaller farms since reform in 2013 in a little more money. the area payments but building an incentive to acquire more land, "says the agraratlas. the problem: "where is large spread, it goes hand in hand with the loss of jobs, with less diverse cropping systems and products, with intensive agriculture and the pollution of the environment," write the authors. the trend towards large enterprise is strong: according to recent figures, from 2003 until 2013, a quarter of all farmers in the area. 96 per cent of them managed less than ten hectares.

boll foundation and government demand that the money away from the area payments to a transformation of the agriculture with animal welfare and a better climate to be redeployed. in germany, the emissions of agriculture at least seven percent of all greenhouse gases.

"without change in the common agricultural policy, the government can merkel their own objectives in the field of nature, environment and climate change," said weiger forget. so far, the draft regulation for the common agricultural policy in the relevant article 28 no specific requirements, to what extent such climate relevant benefits of farmers need to be encouraged; agrarexperte criticized christian rehmer.(徳囯ASK电容器)