＂the technological revolution makes jobs better＂
mr wambach in 2025, so that in seven years, do the machines more work than people. germany is prepared?
we are in germany with our social partnership in good shape. the trade unions in small firms and the technological change actively. we know from studies that the artificial intelligence and the work of 4.0 many jobs to be lost, but also many new emerging. and many jobs are changing. that means the companies need to have their staff training and in new areas.
do you do this?
the large, the small, we see deficits. small and medium-sized enterprises currently have full order books and are looking for experts, which is the technological change at the moment, not a big issue.
the technological revolution destroyed more jobs than it brings?
every technological revolution has meant that the jobs have been improved. if routine of computers and machines are adopted, people can have other, more demanding tasks.
but not all can, are overwhelmed. what will become of them?
the digitalization is different than previous technical changes. there are not necessarily simple activities, but the routinejobs, it in the middle. however, we will also in future and care of the elderly. or in the supermarket.
what jobs will become more important.
there is a lack of skilled workers, especially in the care, in the craft and technology. students are well advised to a mathematics, engineering, it or scientific studies to select. but the training change. from the mechanics is the automotive mechatronics has become, also with computers in the car outside. our job titles and contents of the training to adapt to the new situation, it is good.
the digitization krempelt life completely. what does that mean?
the digitalization is really all aspects of life. this is the first. in addition, our economy is changing. the internet companies are getting bigger and bigger. in the united states account for the top 100 enterprises, almost half of the value added, so we have a considerable concentration. the top five u.s. companies apple, amazon, facebook, google and microsoft are also the most expensive in the world. but you do the most. google and amazon are spending more on research than vw. in germany we are so not used to, we put more on small and medium-sized enterprises. and: the digitization is changing the world of work. employees in germany were accustomed to life in a company to work. now, we hear of the clickworkern, on a freelance basis even for the a, then for other jobs to do.
no wonder the people are afraid of changes.
yes, but if we get it right, people will benefit. you can of routine tasks, liberated, better paid jobs, living standards are rising.
and how do i do that?
we need a powerful checking for misuse for the big internet companies do not have the strands. but we also have to give up our defensive posture.
what do you mean?
about germany has not feet, airbnb is blocked. we need to become more open, if we own internet companies to develop. why must a fintech, full regulation meet? in other countries, if this new company first, make instead of replacing them with regulierungsauflagen block. in the labour market, education is the big issue. and we need to find rules for data handling. firstly, we must protect people. it can't be that someone no affordable health insurance gets more because his health would not come out. on the other hand, provides the sharing economy new opportunities. today, i can have a room to rent airbnb complete strangers because i read the reviews, how serious the guest. abroad, many people only go on because the driver there will be evaluated. the datenökonomie has created new markets.
but it also leads to injustice in the price. apple users pay for orders on the internet more than others.
pay, others less so. they can afford it things, you don't pay. if that is so, i can find a good price. it's like cruises. it used to be just for the rich. but if you have such a journey a year in advance, can people on the ship, the not so well off.
the spd wants big datensammler in internet, forcing data to smaller competitors. right?
if data only in one hand, this is very damaging to the competition. in the push for charm. but in practice, i see lots of problems. personal data may not be transmitted because it was against the eu datenschutzgrundverordnung be violated. and what data should actually be shared? there is much in the dark, you must first heranarbeiten.
a company such as amazon has data from different areas. amazon does with its various services, what i want, what i buy, where i live, when i'm home, the series i see and what kind of music i listen to. it's been very far.
for google's biggest competitors amazon when it comes to search queries. and it's true, big internet companies in different markets are headed, your data pool. it is the task of the authorities have to set limits. the eu commission has on google, the company has banned the google play store with other google apps to link and pre installing the android phones. the checking for misuse must take new paths, the traditional instruments are not enough. amazon has even in the german book market of the market share is well below 30%, enough to initiate a missbrauchsverfahren.
but their monopoly on fixed book prices to give up. in order to make amazon but even more for the small bookshops and ring the death knell.
at the moment of benefit amazon book price fixing. amazon has lower purchase prices than the shops and sold at the same price to the customers. without book price fixing, there have already been competitors, the amazon's margin attack, holding books online cheaper prices. the books, especially the bestseller, cheaper, it would also gain additional readers.
and small bookstores?
the large chains are quite good, the small shops are already less and less. the structural change takes place, the fixed book price slows down it. small bookstores, there are also in countries which do not have book price fixing. the host then readings or other programs with which the customer loyalty. you can't stop the change, we must change.
what does that mean for k-mart and karstadt, go hand in hand. the new german warenhauskonzern have a future? almost all of the people shop on the internet today.
the merger is also a response to the digitization. i am optimistic. i believe that people will continue in the city and in the shops to go, if you there's something attractive. always on the computer or smartphone to sit, can also be boring. the city has its own attraction. karstadt and k-mart have customers. they combine their forces, is right. (徳囯ASK电容器)